Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- versions_comparison [2026/08/31 09:03] – pkovar
+++ versions_comparison [2026/08/31 09:14] (current) – pkovar
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 **Ideal Conditions** [(The antenna is pointed towards the zenith; the satellite is attitude-controlled and stable, with a perfect view of the sky.)]
-<columns 100% l 50%- ->
+<columns 100% l 50% 50% ->
 **pNav** could start takes app. 60 seconds. and is app. 10% faster than pNav2.
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 **Real Conditions**[(At least one condition of Ideal Conditions is not satisfied.)]
-<columns 100%  l 50% - ->
+<columns 100% l 50% 50% ->
 **pNav** cold start is problematic and can take up to hours. Acquisition is not guaranteed.
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 Same problem as Real Conditions Acquisition.
-<columns 100% l 50%- ->
+<columns 100% l 50% 50% ->
 pNav is very slow. Reacquisition is not guaranteed.
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 ===== Tracking Sensitivity =====
-<columns 100% l 50%- ->
+<columns 100% l 50% 50% ->
 **pNav** can track only open sky satellites.
 <newcolumn>
-The tracking loops of pNav2 were optimized to track weak signals; see the "Navigation of Rotating Satellite" in the datasheet.
+The tracking loops of **pNav2** were optimized to track weak signals; see the "Navigation of Rotating Satellite" in the datasheet.
+</columns>
+===== Antenna =====
+<columns 100% l 50% 50% ->
+.3V feeding. No feeding current limiter.
+<newcolumn>
+.85V feeding. Feeding current limiter.
+Power supply 2.85 V. Supply current limiter. For optimal noise and intermodulation suppression, we recommend an active antenna with a wide beam and LNA gain of maximum 10 dB.
 </columns>